Seventh Circuit Discovers Hospital Not A “Credit History Coverage Firm”

In Tierney v. Supporter Wellness & & Hospitals Corp., the Seventh Circuit just recently attested the dismissal of a Fair Credit History Coverage Act (” FCRA”) grievance and also discovered that a medical facility was not a “credit score reporting firm” under the FCRA.

The Tierney situation was submitted by six plaintiffs who declared FCRA claims against Supporter Wellness & & Hospitals Firm (” Supporter”) based upon the burglary of certain desktop from Supporter’s administrative offices. According to the complainants, Advocate was accountable for those burglaries due to the fact that Advocate presumably did too little to safeguard the plaintiffs’ information.

The area Court disregarded the FCRA complaint for failing to mention an insurance claim and found that the plaintiffs’ did not have standing. The Seventh Circuit affirmed, locating in appropriate part that Advocate did not fulfill the FCRA’s three-pronged interpretation of a “credit rating reporting agency.” That three-pronged definition calls for a complainant to reveal that an individual: (1 ) for monetary fees, charges, or on a participating not-for-profit basis, (2 ) on a regular basis participates in whole or partly in the method of putting together or assessing consumer credit details or various other information on customers ( 3) for the function of equipping consumer records to 3rd parties. 15 U.S.C. § 1681a( f).

Criminal Defense Lawyer:

While finding that Supporter arguably met the 2nd prong due to the fact that it regularly constructed clients’ individual and medical information, the Seventh Circuit discovered that Supporter did not satisfy the first and also 3rd prongs since it did not assemble information for monetary costs as well as did not assemble information for the function of furnishing customer reports. Rather, Supporter assembled individuals’ individual and also clinical info for its own experiences with its own individuals, as well as the only charges received by Advocate were those obtained for services actually provided to Supporter patients.

Thus, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the termination of the complainants’ FCRA insurance claims because Advocate did not satisfy the definition of a “credit rating coverage firm” under the FCRA.

Tierney is a success for health care service providers, and provides vital criterion for health care service providers resisting future FCRA cases.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s